
by Kathryn Kyte
I’ve debated writing this type of piece for, well over a year. When I first took in the notion (circa la 90’s?) of indie as a label definition and indie as an image—I immediately knew it was a slippery slope of convoluted checkmarks and disses, all ending in the question of “what is indie?” Rather than sit here and metaphorically describe the latitudes and longitudes of modern music, I felt the need to further delve into the complexity of the not indie, not mainstream perspective.
In recent months I’ve come across a slew of new artists, a joyful scan of longstanding and notable musicians; and still have trouble understanding why some acts are intrinsically cool while others have to worry about the colour of their Gibson, just to get noticed. And, there seems to be this level of prestige associated with independent artists for doing it the “non-label” way. Doing what exactly? Playing shows? Making music? A writer for example still creates and doesn’t stress and boast about being an independent writer.
Noticeably there has been a shift in the contextual lifestyle of indie. Interestingly now, some acts receive a multitude of exposure, hype and psyched followers—perhaps so much so that “lowering” themselves to the genuine indie circle, seems daunting, and a step backwards.
In simple terms, it’s harder to sell indie artists on the indie scene unless they have no fan base and are in need of attention. If they have it or can taste it, they’d rather do it rockstar styles and opt to neglect the very industry that attempts to feed them at times when the main paycheck doesn’t come through. Aka, the “mom I need money” model.
Does it anger me? No, I didn’t make up the name indie, nor the underlying meaning of it. Does it make me question the integrity of artists these days? Perhaps. Does it make me wonder when music became so cutthroat and snooty, yet full of simply terrible bands? Always.
Then I inadvertently start thinking about acts that are still seen as indie and the groups that are trying desperately to change-up shop, repeatedly noticing how a name has basically shaped and disabled an industry. Does being indie make you cool? Or does it hinder you from being totally cool? Ahem.
I’ve debated writing this type of piece for, well over a year. When I first took in the notion (circa la 90’s?) of indie as a label definition and indie as an image—I immediately knew it was a slippery slope of convoluted checkmarks and disses, all ending in the question of “what is indie?” Rather than sit here and metaphorically describe the latitudes and longitudes of modern music, I felt the need to further delve into the complexity of the not indie, not mainstream perspective.
In recent months I’ve come across a slew of new artists, a joyful scan of longstanding and notable musicians; and still have trouble understanding why some acts are intrinsically cool while others have to worry about the colour of their Gibson, just to get noticed. And, there seems to be this level of prestige associated with independent artists for doing it the “non-label” way. Doing what exactly? Playing shows? Making music? A writer for example still creates and doesn’t stress and boast about being an independent writer.
Noticeably there has been a shift in the contextual lifestyle of indie. Interestingly now, some acts receive a multitude of exposure, hype and psyched followers—perhaps so much so that “lowering” themselves to the genuine indie circle, seems daunting, and a step backwards.
In simple terms, it’s harder to sell indie artists on the indie scene unless they have no fan base and are in need of attention. If they have it or can taste it, they’d rather do it rockstar styles and opt to neglect the very industry that attempts to feed them at times when the main paycheck doesn’t come through. Aka, the “mom I need money” model.
Does it anger me? No, I didn’t make up the name indie, nor the underlying meaning of it. Does it make me question the integrity of artists these days? Perhaps. Does it make me wonder when music became so cutthroat and snooty, yet full of simply terrible bands? Always.
Then I inadvertently start thinking about acts that are still seen as indie and the groups that are trying desperately to change-up shop, repeatedly noticing how a name has basically shaped and disabled an industry. Does being indie make you cool? Or does it hinder you from being totally cool? Ahem.


RSS Feed